| 摘要: |
| 目的：分析磁刺激干预肿瘤领域的研究热点及发展趋势。方法：检索中国知网（China National
Knowledge Infrastructure，CNKI）、万方数据（WANFANG DATA）、维普中文科技期刊数据库（VIP Information，
VIP）和中国生物医学文献（SinoMed）等数据库，筛选1990 年1 月1 日至2024 年12 月31 日发表的磁刺激干
预肿瘤领域相关文献。运用VOSviewer1.6.2 和CiteSpace6.4.R1 软件对作者、研究机构及关键词进行可视化分
析。结果：共纳入87 篇文献。磁刺激干预肿瘤领域的研究文献呈现出缓慢增长的趋势；核心作者以杨学军、
韩小翠为代表。研究机构以大学及其附属医院为主，发文量靠前的机构为天津医科大学总医院、山东大学、天
津医科大学，各研究机构之间的合作有待进一步提升；目前研究热点集中于机制探索与临床应用两类，前者多
聚焦静磁场的免疫调节作用及磁性纳米载体靶向递送机制，后者则涉及肿瘤术后康复、情感障碍干预及其与
中医外治法联合应用的相关研究。结论：磁刺激干预肿瘤领域研究目前仍处于初级阶段，建议构建多学科交
叉平台，标准化治疗参数体系及安全性监测模型，以推动该领域进一步发展。 |
| 关键词: 肿瘤 磁刺激 研究热点 CiteSpace 可视化分析 机制 临床应用 |
| DOI： |
|
|
| Research hotspots in magnetic stimulation intervention for tumors in China: A study based onCiteSpace |
| YUE Dongqin,YE Tao,CHEN Yayi,JIANG Li,CHEN Kangli |
| (Guizhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guiyang 550025, Guizhou, China;Guizhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guiyang 550025, Guizhou, China; The First Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guiyang 550025, Guizhou, China) |
| Abstract: |
| Objective: To investigate the research hotspots and development trends in the field of magnetic stimulation
intervention for tumors. Methods: Databases including CNKI, WANFANG DATA, VIP, and SinoMed were searched for
articles on magnetic stimulation intervention for tumors published from Jan 1st, 1990 to Dec 31st, 2024. VOSviewer 1.6.2 and CiteSpace 6.4.R1 were used to conduct a visual analysis of authors, research institutions, and keywords. Results: A total of 87 articles were included. There was a slow increase in the number of research articles in the field of magnetic stimulation intervention for tumors. The core authors were Yang Xuejun and Han Xiaocui. Universities and their affiliated hospitals were the main research institutions, and top institutions in terms of publication volume were Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Shandong University, and Tianjin Medical University. Collaboration between research institutions needs further enhancement. Current research hotspots focused on mechanism exploration and clinical application, and the former mostly focused on the immunomodulatory effect of static magnetic fields and the targeted delivery mechanisms of magnetic nanocarriers, while the latter involved the research on postoperative rehabilitation, intervention for affective disorders, and its combination with traditional Chinese medicine external treatment. Conclusion: Current research in the field of magnetic stimulation intervention for tumors is still in the preliminary stage, and it is recommended to build multidisciplinary platforms, standardize treatment parameter systems, and establish safety monitoring models, in order to further promote the development of this field. |
| Key words: tumor magnetic stimulation research hotspots CiteSpace visual analysis mechanism clinical application |
